The Cash Reimagined PodcastAfter studying this text, be sure you try the newest version of our podcast. This week, Sheila Warren and I discuss to H
The Cash Reimagined Podcast
After studying this text, be sure you try the newest version of our podcast.
This week, Sheila Warren and I discuss to Hyperledger Govt Director Brian Behlendorf about self-sovereign identification, the subject of the column under. A developer whose three-decade profession has seen him deeply concerned in efforts to foster a extra open web, Brian grasps, like few others, the nuances of how human beings ought to reside inside a quickly altering digital financial system.
Getting web identification proper, 30 years on
We have a tendency to consider governments, with the info they accumulate on births, drivers licenses, tax returns and passports, as humanity’s main identification managers.
Arguably, web platforms have usurped that function. Some retailer extra figuring out information than China – Fb has 2.7 billion lively customers; Google manages 1.5 billion electronic mail accounts. Simply as essential, they will tie these information to our on-line conduct and collect immense predictive energy. Fb’s algorithm even is aware of if you’ll break up together with your companion – earlier than you do.
This isn’t one other Fb-bashing column. It’s simply that its all-knowing energy highlights how the elemental human query of identification has modified within the web age.
It additionally illustrates why we want a brand new “self-sovereign” mannequin of identification to match our digital existence and why the newest strikes towards that deserve widespread help.
Flawed from the beginning
An authentic sin was dedicated on the web’s conception: its underlying, decentralized structure was constructed with out an identification layer.
The web’s founders had good intentions. To make sure common availability, the system managed entry by assigning addresses to computer systems however was agnostic concerning the identities of the individuals, firms and units utilizing them. As a well-known New Yorker cartoon quipped in 1993, “On the web, no person is aware of you’re a canine.”
This grew to become an issue when entrepreneurs began constructing e-commerce companies within the 1990s. Customers wanted to belief the individual on the opposite aspect of a transaction, which, in keeping with offline practices, meant figuring out them to carry them accountable.

So a jury-rigged resolution was put in on the web’s software layer. Certification powers had been launched, permitting web-based firms to collect and confirm customers’ figuring out info. Over time, this gave rise to a brand new class of immensely highly effective gatekeepers.
We ended up with the worst of each worlds. On the one hand, finish customers nonetheless don’t know who’s controlling disinformation bots. On the opposite, as CoinDesk’s Ben Powers put it in an excellent contribution to our “Web 2030” sequence, the centralized knowledge gatherers “not solely know you’re a canine, but additionally what breed you might be, what your favourite kibble is and whether or not you’ve been microchipped.”
This energy asymmetry has fueled a extreme deterioration in societal belief, and options have been hamstrung by a pre-internet mindset. We’ve positioned duty for policing conduct with intermediaries, which has additional empowered centralized knowledge gatherers.
This contradicts the web’s decentralized, identity-free base layer, creating distinctive alternatives for abuse. Web pages accumulate big honeypots of non-public figuring out info (PII), that are consistently breached by unidentified hackers.
In the meantime, though firms complain concerning the legal responsibility in storing person knowledge, they discover it arduous to withstand surveillance capitalism, the data-exploitation observe that has grow to be the core enterprise mannequin of the web.
We want a brand new mindset. As a result of the web’s underlying structure is decentralized, the identification resolution should even be decentralized. Management over PII should reside with these to whom it refers – with you and me, in different phrases. That is the precept behind the “self-sovereign identification” (SSI) motion.
Controlling attributes, not identification
Let’s be clear: This isn’t straightforward. Identification is a particularly complicated idea.
Within the metaphysical sense of “who I’m,” identification is without delay extremely private and utterly social. We worth a novel selfhood, however it’s meaningless irrespective of the society inside which that self exists.
It’s additionally fluid and multilayered. We occupy – or “carry out”– completely different variations of our identification, or personas, relying on context. All of us play a unique persona in job interviews than the one we play at dwelling with household.
And within the wider financial system, the place proofs of identification clear up the deep-seated problem of belief, permitting us to transact, what issues will not be our selfhood however the distinct attributes that comprise it. Do you’ve got a level? A driver’s license? A credit score rating over 740? These are remoted attributes. They aren’t our identification per se.
With SSI, refined cryptography permits people, as sole custodians of their knowledge, to show they’ve the credentials that describe their…