Media playback is unsupported in your gadget Media captionBoris Johnson says he'll meet bereaved households wh
Media playback is unsupported in your gadget
Boris Johnson says he’ll meet a gaggle of households bereaved by coronavirus when their “litigation” with the federal government has “concluded”.
However Covid-19 Bereaved Households for Justice say it’s “merely not true” they’re in litigation with the federal government and it’s a “poor excuse”.
They’ve repeated their demand for a gathering with the PM to debate their name for an inquiry into the pandemic.
Downing Road has been contacted for a response.
Covid-19 Bereaved Households for Justice say they’ve written 5 instances to Mr Johnson to request a gathering.
Requested in regards to the letters, in a stay TV interview final week, the prime minister stated he would “in fact” meet anybody bereaved by Covid-19.
However days later he wrote to the group to say he was “unable” to fulfill them.
‘Frustration’
The group, which says it represents 1,600 households, stated it was “devastated” to obtain the letter, which it has made public.
At Prime Minister’s Questions, Labour Chief Sir Keir Starmer – who met the group in July – requested if Mr Johnson would change his thoughts, saying the PM “will perceive the frustration and the damage of these households that he stated one factor to digicam and one other factor to them”.
Mr Johnson stated: “In fact I’d be very pleased to fulfill the households of the bereaved and sympathise deeply with all those that have misplaced family members all through this pandemic and all of us really feel their ache and their grief.
“It seems that this specific group are at present in litigation with the federal government. I’ll actually meet them as soon as that litigation is concluded.”
Media playback is unsupported in your gadget
Elkan Abrahamson, a lawyer for Covid Bereaved Households for Justice, stated it was “merely not true” that the group is in litigation with the federal government.
The group is contemplating looking for a judicial evaluate of the choice to not maintain an instantaneous inquiry into the pandemic.
‘Save lives’
On 26 August, it despatched the federal government’s authorized division a “letter earlier than motion” calling for a gathering with the PM, which says “the households want to resolve these points with out the necessity to resort to litigation”.
Mr Abrahamson stated the group had but to obtain a reply to this letter.
“Even when there was litigation events are at all times inspired to fulfill in particular person to try to resolve their variations so I do not actually see that as an excuse,” he added.
Jo Goodman, co-founder of Covid-19 Bereaved Households for Justice, who misplaced her dad Stuart to the virus, stated: “It looks like we are the mistaken sort of bereaved folks – just like the prime minister solely needs to fulfill with bereaved individuals who will not ask tough questions.
“There is no authorized motion taking place, so that may’t be the explanation he is not assembly with us.
“So will he now commit to fulfill with us so we will share our experiences of great points – from deaths in care houses to insufficient protecting gear – that may assist him study essential classes and save lives?”
Covid-19 Bereaved Households for Justice is asking for an impartial, judge-led, statutory public inquiry into coronavirus deaths, which it needs to start imminently.
Media playback is unsupported in your gadget
A Downing Road spokesperson stated earlier that the PM remained dedicated to assembly individuals who have been bereaved on account of Covid-19, and that he was “resolute in his willpower to beat this virus” to forestall additional “dreadful loss”.
In July the prime minister dedicated to an impartial inquiry into the pandemic, however has repeatedly stated now was not the proper time.
What may an inquiry appear to be?
Unbiased inquiries can take many types – from full public inquiries that may take years, or in some instances many years, and value hundreds of thousands of kilos; to smaller scale, extra fleet-footed investigations.
The thought is to carry the highly effective to account and attempt to study classes from choices which have gone mistaken, and tips on how to keep away from repeating scandals and tragic occasions sooner or later.
Latest examples of judge-led inquiries embody the Leveson inquiry into media requirements, or the continued inquiry into the Grenfell Tower disaster.
Different inquiries, comparable to 2009 Iraq inquiry, headed by a retired senior civil servant Sir John Chilcot, don’t take proof below oath.
The federal government of the day is often anticipated to undertake many, if not all, of the suggestions of an official inquiry, though it doesn’t at all times work out like that in apply.
- WILL COVID-19 CHANGE THE WORLD OF WORK FOR GOOD?: Is working from residence a long-term answer?
- “WE’RE ALL STRONGER THAN WE THINK”: What are the positives of 2020?