Skadden Mentioned to Have Paid $11 Million to Settle Ukraine Dispute

HomeUS Politics

Skadden Mentioned to Have Paid $11 Million to Settle Ukraine Dispute

WASHINGTON — The New York-based legislation agency Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom has paid $11 million or extra to keep away from a lawsu


WASHINGTON — The New York-based legislation agency Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom has paid $11 million or extra to keep away from a lawsuit by a former Ukrainian prime minister, Yulia V. Tymoshenko, who blamed the agency for aiding in her political persecution.

The settlement, which has not been beforehand reported, is expounded to the agency’s illustration beginning in 2012 of the Russia-aligned authorities of Viktor F. Yanukovych, then the president of Ukraine.

In a December 2018 interview with The New York Times in Washington, she recalled “it was very painful” learning of Skadden’s work “when I was in prison and was observing this in solitary confinement.”

Speaking through an interpreter, she accused Skadden’s lawyers and other prominent Westerners of “whitewashing Yanukovych and his government” in exchange for money, adding: “It’s a pity that such a well-known company like Skadden even considered to take this case to deliver. This is a dirty, dirty, dirty contract.”

After the interview, she and her lawyer, Sergei Vlasenko, who has also claimed he was treated unfairly by the Yanukovych government, retained the law firm Reid Collins & Tsai to explore the possibility of suing Skadden over its work, according to two people familiar with the arrangement.

Skadden paid $11 million or more to settle the case before a lawsuit was filed, according to people familiar with the settlement. Funds from the settlement appear to have been passed through Reid Collins to Ms. Tymoshenko and Mr. Vlasenko.

That arrangement appears to be reflected in records filed by Ms. Tymoshenko and Mr. Vlasenko with the Ukrainian government, which show that they each received about $5.5 million from Reid Collins between July and last month.

Skadden has continued to publicly defend its Ukraine work, casting the Tymoshenko report as a cleareyed, independent assessment that did not absolve Mr. Yanukovych of wrongdoing. The report concluded that while Ms. Tymoshenko’s trial violated some of her rights, her conviction was supported by the evidence presented at trial. And the report found no evidence that the prosecution was politically motivated.

But the settlement suggests that the firm is not eager to continue to publicly defend the report or its work in Ukraine.

Skadden did not respond to multiple requests for comment to its lawyers and public relations executives, including an email containing a detailed list of questions about the settlement. Mr. Craig declined to comment.

In the post, Ms. Tymoshenko heralded the settlement as “further proof that my imprisonment in 2011-2014 was a political reprisal against me.” She added, “there will be no further details,” because of “legal restrictions in the case,” suggesting that the agreement might be subject to a confidentiality clause.



www.nytimes.com