Trump says he has not seen Bolton’s manuscript.

HomeUS Politics

Trump says he has not seen Bolton’s manuscript.

President Trump assembly with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel within the Oval Workplace on Monday.Credit score...Calla Kessler/The New


Credit score…Calla Kessler/The New York Instances

President Trump, who raged all through the morning in regards to the launch of a White Home memoir written by John Bolton, his former nationwide safety adviser, advised reporters gathered on the White Home that he had not really seen the manuscript for the e-book.

Nonetheless, the president disputed as “false” two of the e-book’s main claims: that Mr. Bolton and others had tried to dissuade Mr. Trump from withholding army aide to Ukraine, and that the president was satisfied that Ukraine had meddled within the 2016 election.

Credit score…Doug Mills/The New York Instances

Among the many Senate Republicans indignant on the White Home on Monday over revelations a few manuscript submitted for overview by John R. Bolton are high allies of President Trump, together with Senator Mitch McConnell, the bulk chief.

Simply hours earlier than the trial was set to renew, Mr. McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, have been privately urgent the president’s advisers for a proof about Mr. Bolton’s account, which undercuts a key White Home protection of the president and blindsided the senators, in line with individuals aware of their pondering.

Talking to reporters within the basement of the Capitol on Monday, Mr. Graham declined to element his talks with the White Home and mentioned the report would possible not change his place on the end result of the trial. However requested if he trusted Mr. Bolton, Mr. Graham retorted: “I don’t know if I belief anyone proper now.”

He mentioned the previous nationwide safety adviser “could also be a related witness.”

Mr. Graham skipped a information convention within the Capitol Monday morning at which he was beforehand scheduled to look.

Senators have been advised that White Home attorneys deliberate to push forward with their protection as deliberate on Monday, arguing that the president had not dedicated impeachable offenses.

Credit score…Doug Mills/The New York Instances

Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and one of the carefully watched swing votes on calling witnesses, mentioned in an announcement on Monday that new revelations from John R. Bolton, the previous White Home nationwide safety adviser, “strengthen the case for witnesses” in President Trump’s impeachment trial.

Her feedback got here the morning after The New York Instances reported that Mr. Bolton wrote in his forthcoming e-book that Mr. Trump had straight linked $391 million in army support for Ukraine to investigations he needed of his political rivals, saying that he wouldn’t launch the cash till he bought the knowledge he sought.

Ms. Collins, who has mentioned that she is open to calling witnesses and would possible vote to take action, additionally appeared to counsel that different Republicans have been now speaking privately about whether or not to do the identical.

“The stories about John Bolton’s e-book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted various conversations amongst my colleagues,” she mentioned within the assertion.

Within the wake of weekend revelations from John R. Bolton, President Trump’s former nationwide safety adviser, Republican defenders of Mr. Trump are on the lookout for any ammunition to undercut the Democratic argument in favor of calling new witnesses.

One instance: a information convention from twenty years in the past by a present Democratic Home supervisor arguing towards the necessity for extra testimony.

Consultant Jerrold Nadler, now the chairman of the Home Judiciary Committee, was requested at a 1998 information convention whether or not Democrats defending then-President Invoice Clinton from impeachment ought to assist calling witnesses within the inquiry. Mr. Nadler mentioned no.

“There are some individuals who assume that we must always ask to subpoena sure witnesses. My very own private opinion is that we shouldn’t,” Mr. Nadler told reporters. “My very own private opinion is that it’s the obligation of those that wish to impeach the president to make the case. They’ve bought to name the witnesses who will set up the case. They haven’t achieved so.”

Republican senators have been arguing that Democrats within the Home — not the Senate — have been answerable for calling officers like him and others who have been blocked by the president from testifying within the Home inquiry. Now, as they search for methods to maintain a handful of Republican moderates from leaping ship and voting with Democrats, they’re hoping that feedback, just like the one from Mr. Nadler greater than 20 years in the past, may assist.

Democrats don’t simply wish to hear from John R. Bolton, President Trump’s former nationwide safety adviser. In addition they need his notes…



www.nytimes.com