Throughout Thursday's GameStop listening to, Citadel Securities' Ken Griffin defended a controversial methodology brokerages use to earn a living,
Throughout Thursday’s GameStop listening to, Citadel Securities’ Ken Griffin defended a controversial methodology brokerages use to earn a living, and mentioned his agency would adapt if new rules prohibited the apply.
Lawmakers lastly bought an opportunity to press Robinhood, Citadel and Reddit chiefs concerning the GameStop buying and selling controversy.
Members of Congress spent a lot of their time prodding about “cost for order movement,” a apply by which a brokerage receives cost from a market maker, often called a seller, for guiding the order to them.
This mannequin is how Robinhood and different brokers are in a position to have commission-free buying and selling.
Robinhood made greater than $221 million from cost for order movement within the fourth quarter of 2020. In the meantime, Citadel Securities is a market maker.
“We merely play by the principles of the highway,” mentioned Griffin. “Fee for order movement had been expressly authorised by the SEC, it’s a customary apply inside the business,” he mentioned, referring to the Securities and Trade Fee. “In the event that they select to alter the principles of the highway, we have to drive on the left facet versus the best facet, that is wonderful with us.”
“I do imagine that cost for order movement has been an essential supply of innovation within the business. Because the CEO of Robinhood has testified, they drove the business towards zero-dollar commissions. This has been a giant win for American traders,” Griffin added.
Griffin was pressed by Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., concerning the “finest execution” apply of the market maker.
Sherman prodded about whether or not Robinhood shoppers obtain worse execution as a result of Robinhood makes use of the zero-commissions income mannequin supported by cost for order movement. Sherman mentioned after talking to business consultants, when brokers are being paid for order movement, clients worsen execution.
Griffin mentioned “the standard of execution varies by the channel of the order” and “measurement of the order is just one issue.”
The Citadel chief began to say that as a result of the Robinhood order comes from a neighborhood of particular person merchants who are inclined to transact in smaller greenback quantities, that would have an effect on the execution. Nonetheless, he was interrupted by an agitated Sherman.
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev echoed Griffin’s sentiment, explaining why Citadel will get a big portion of the agency’s trades.
“Our system routes orders based mostly on who supplies the perfect execution and high quality for our clients. The explanation Citadel will get a comparatively excessive proportion of our buyer order movement is as a result of they supply superior execution high quality,” mentioned Tenev.
A change to the cost for order movement legality would pose a significant danger to the pioneer of free buying and selling.
“Fee for order movement allows commission-free buying and selling,” Tenev added. “Once we began folks did not suppose there was sufficient margin to make this enterprise work, however we have been lucky to make it work and make it work for our clients.
Robinhood’s buying and selling restrictions
Representatives repeatedly requested Tenev if the millennial inventory buying and selling app restricted buying and selling for another purpose than to satisfy depository necessities.
Tenev cited elevated capital necessities from the Depository Belief and Clearing Corp., an entity answerable for settling and clearing trades, for the buying and selling restrictions. Robinhood raised greater than $3.four billion in a number of days to shore up its stability sheet and drop among the restrictions.
“That further capital…was completely to organize for a future, even larger, black swan occasion and to unrestrict on the buying and selling and shopping for of those securities,” mentioned Tenev. “The $3.four billion we raised I believe goes a good distance in cushioning the agency for future market volatility and different related black swan occasions.”
He instructed the representatives that the GameStop mania was a one in 3.5 million occasion, which he mentioned was “unmodelable.” Tenev mentioned Robinhood’s danger administration processes kicked in as they had been designed.
The Robinhood chief was pressed about why the buying and selling app restricted on the purchase facet of GameStop final month.
“Shopping for securities will increase our collateral necessities, promoting doesn’t,” mentioned Tenev. “Furthermore, stopping clients from promoting is a really troublesome and painful expertise the place clients are unable to entry their cash…I think about it will have been considerably worse if we had prevented clients from promoting.”
Tenev mentioned the vast majority of Robinhood shoppers are engaged in purchase and maintain investing methods with solely about 13% buying and selling within the choices market and solely about 3% buying and selling on margin.
“We’re additionally a self-directed brokerage, so which means we do not present recommendation and we do not make suggestions for what clients ought to or mustn’t spend money on,” mentioned Tenev.
The full worth of Robinhood’s clients’ property exceeds the online amount of cash its shoppers have deposited into Robinhood by over $35 billion, he added.
Tenev additionally advocated for real-time settlement as an alternative of two-day settlement to be able to assist fight among the chaos that occurred through the GameStop saga.
Watch the total testimony right here.
Subscribe to CNBC PRO for unique insights and evaluation, and stay enterprise day programming from around the globe.