The proceedings have been carried on cable information. However the aesthetic was low-budget “Westworld.”The Senate Well being Committee’s question
The proceedings have been carried on cable information. However the aesthetic was low-budget “Westworld.”
The Senate Well being Committee’s questioning of 4 administration well being officers Tuesday morning, on the federal government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, was the highest-profile congressional testimony in weeks. As many states transfer towards reopening even because the loss of life tolls rise, the topic was if, when and the way issues would possibly safely get again to normal-ish.
However all the things within the Senate’s surreal and desolate visible presentation solely underlined that we’re light-years away from regular.
Usually, a high-profile Senate look is the theater of congestion. The testifiers seem, flanked by advisers, and face a forest of cameras and microphones as they stare down a crowded financial institution of legislators.
Tuesday’s proceedings seemed as a substitute like a tribunal in some depopulated cyber-western dystopia.
A remote-operated digicam robo-swiveled on the open chamber flooring, as a few human photographers darted about. The picture of Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee — the committee chair, self-quarantining after an aide tested positive for the coronavirus — hovered on a screen above an empty chair. The guests all appeared virtually, three of them also in some form of precautionary isolation.
And the handful of senators attending in person kept a cautious distance, with Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, shrouded in a bandanna as if he’d just come back from robbing a stagecoach.
This did not look like the America that President Trump painted Monday, when he declared that the country had “prevailed” against its recent challenge. It was a ghost town with everything but the tumbleweeds.
The guests included Dr. Robert R. Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Adm. Brett P. Giroir, the assistant secretary for health; and Dr. Stephen M. Hahn, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration.
But top billing belonged to Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert and the administration’s point person on pandemic response, whose boss in the White House prefers wishful triumphalism, tweets and ramblings to following doctor’s orders.
An advance report said that Dr. Fauci planned to warn of “needless suffering and death” if states rushed to reopen before meeting guideposts of progress, suggesting that, out of Mr. Trump’s eye line, he might offer harsher medicine.
Instead, he slipped the scalpel in gently. (The ranking committee Democrat, Patty Murray of Washington, ended up pre-empting his “suffering and death” line in her opening questions.) He warned that “the consequences could be really serious” if states moved too fast, and — countering a Trumpist insinuation that the Covid-19 death count, now over 80,000, has been inflated — agreed that the actual toll is likely higher than the official figures.
But he also offered a spoonful of optimism, venturing that it was “more likely than not” that a vaccine would be available in a year or two, while maintaining his genial family-practitioner-from-Brooklyn tone. Away from the presidential briefings that played like “The Apprentice,” he likened the process of approving potential treatments to “Shark Tank.” (The references change, but the reality-TV-ness of this administration never goes away.)
The sharpest conflict came when Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, assailed “doom and gloom” predictions about the virus and told Dr. Fauci, “I don’t think you’re the end-all” with regard to reopening policy. Replied the immunologist to the ophthalmologist: “I give advice according to the best scientific evidence.”
It’s possible that the logistics lent themselves less to theatrics and confrontation. Amid the usual lags and audio glitches — Mr. Redfield’s connection was especially shaky — it’s hard to have a good fight over videoconference.
Instead, the background details of the telecommuting legislators competed with the public-health questions and speechifying. Senator Mike Enzi, Republican of Wyoming, spoke from an office outfitted with a set of desk antlers, while Senator Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont, was backed by a Red Hot Chili Peppers poster.
The most pointed political battle of the morning was less about what came out of the mouths of senators than what covered them, or didn’t. The Democrats in the committee room mostly wore masks. The Republicans largely didn’t, or removed them before the proceedings started.
Face masks — worn mainly to keep the wearer from inadvertently infecting others — have become a metonym for the now-partisan argument over how worrisome the pandemic is, how much people should change their routines because of it and the extent to which people are morally and socially obligated to inconvenience themselves for the good of others.
What should be a matter of objective public-health practice has become one more polarizing cultural signal, splashed across your kisser. Fittingly, Senator Susan Collins of Maine, one of the more moderate Republicans and facing a tough re-election campaign, began the hearing with no mask, then put one on, as if trying to keep one lung in each camp.
Dr. Fauci was alone and maskless on video. But late in the hearing, he spoke approvingly of how, outdoors in Washington, D.C., “you can see many people out there with masks on, which gives me some degree of comfort that people are taking this very seriously.”
If it was a comment on what we witnessed in the hearing room, he kept it oblique. That’s the beauty of videoconferencing: No one knows exactly what you’re seeing on your own screen.