The proof that minimum wage laws increase wages for employed people is fairly stable at this level. However 4 current research counsel one other
The proof that minimum wage laws increase wages for employed people is fairly stable at this level. However 4 current research counsel one other crucially vital impact: They may save lives, too.
The latest of the papers, authored by John Kaufman, Leslie Salas-Hernández, Kelli Komro, and Melvin Livingston in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, examined month-to-month information throughout the US from 1990 to 2015 and estimated {that a} $1 improve within the minimal wage led to a 3.four to five.9 p.c decline in suicides amongst adults with a highschool training or much less. The authors additionally estimated that over the 26-year interval, a $1 improve in every state’s minimal wage may have prevented 27,550 suicide deaths, or about 1,059 per yr.
The paper has created a bit of a stir. Nevertheless it’s simply one in all 4 research up to now couple of years to seek out an affiliation between larger minimal wages and decrease dying charges (particularly suicides).
If these findings maintain up in subsequent analysis, they supply a brand new, persuasive rationale for elevating the minimal wage.
The proof that the minimal wage saves lives, reviewed
Let’s put aside the latest examine on the minimal wage and suicide and take a look at papers from the previous yr that reached comparable conclusions.
A 2019 paper by Alex Gertner, Jason Rotter, and Paul Shafer, which checked out modifications in state-level minimal wages from 2006 to 2016, discovered {that a} $1 improve within the minimal wage was related to a 1.9 p.c decline in suicide charges. This paper managed for financial and well being elements like unemployment, the per-capita state GDP, state spending on Medicaid, and the uninsured price. However the authors urged that their outcomes “shouldn’t essentially be interpreted as causal,” given the shortage of an experimental or quasi-experimental examine design.
One other 2019 working paper, by economists William Dow, Anna Godøy, Christopher Lowenstein, and Michael Reich, all from UC Berkeley, tried to make use of extra rigorous causal identification to measure the consequences of each the minimal wage and the earned revenue tax credit score (a money profit tied to work and distributed primarily to poor households with children), on “deaths of despair”: suicides, alcohol poisoning, and drug overdose.
That paper used a “variations in variations” methodology that tracked how such dying charges modified in states that elevated the minimal wage after which in contrast these with modifications in dying charges in states the place the minimal wage was stagnant. This technique required a key assumption: that traits in suicide charges within the states being in contrast would have been equivalent, absent the change in minimal wage coverage. To ensure this holds, the Dow/Godøy/Lowenstein/Reich paper carried out the identical evaluation on faculty graduates, only a few of whom are paid minimal wage and are possible not affected by the coverage.
The paper discovered no impact on drug or alcohol deaths from both the minimal wage or EITC, however did discover {that a} 10 p.c improve within the minimal wage decreased the speed of suicide amongst adults with a highschool training or much less by 3.6 p.c; a 10 p.c improve within the EITC, in the meantime, diminished suicides in that group by 5.5 p.c. Tellingly, the authors discovered no results on faculty graduates, including credibility to the inference that the minimal wage itself precipitated the decline in suicides.
Lastly, one other current paper discovered that the minimal wage saves a major variety of lives in one other context: nursing properties. Krista Ruffini, a doctoral scholar on the Goldman College of Public Coverage at Berkeley, pulled collectively 25 years of administrative data for sufferers in long-term residential care and tried to isolate how their well being modified in response to their caregivers getting a minimal wage improve.
Ruffini’s has the strongest causal identification, for my part, of any of those papers (although it’s value noting that hers remains to be unpublished): she in contrast counties the place the minimal wage was elevated with neighboring counties the place it was not, a classy technique utilized in cutting-edge studies of the minimum wage’s impact on jobs. She discovered that minimal wage will increase normally translated to larger pay for nursing dwelling employees — a 10 p.c hike within the minimal wage raised their common pay by 1.2 to 1.7 p.c.
This, Ruffini paperwork, has a wide range of well being results, together with fewer well being code violations throughout inspections, fewer bedsores (technically referred to as “strain ulcers”), and, most significantly, a big discount in mortality. Elevating the minimal wage by 10 p.c would forestall 15,000 to 16,000 deaths in nursing properties yearly, Ruffini estimated.
Ruffini admits she’s not totally positive what’s driving this end result. It may very well be that larger wages entice higher staff who present higher care; it may very well be that tighter revenue margins drive nursing properties to direct care extra effectively, or that it motivates employees to be extra productive (a speculation often called “effectivity wages”). However she additionally notes that two recent studies have advised that elevated staffing in nursing properties reduces mortality. It wouldn’t shock me if “extra employees” and “higher employees” had comparable results on affected person outcomes.
The newest paper, defined
The brand new paper within the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health estimates a 3.four to five.9 p.c decline in suicides from a $1 improve within the minimal wage. It makes use of a strategy considerably just like the Dow et al. paper, with college-educated adults as a management group, assuming that individuals with out highschool diplomas are extra affected by minimal wage hikes and the consequences on suicide can be concentrated there. The authors additionally management for different state-level elements like unemployment, GDP, and welfare take-up.
Not like the Dow et. al. paper, the brand new paper doesn’t use the greenback worth of the minimal wage as its unbiased variable; as a substitute, it makes use of the distinction between the federal and state minimal wages, which capabilities a lot the identical means. States with larger minimums, naturally, have a better distinction from the federal minimal than states with decrease minimums
The paper will not be with out its critics. One noteworthy voice was Congressional Joint Financial Committee Chair Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), whose spokesman told the Washington Post, “By this logic, if we raised the federal minimal wage whereas conserving state minimal wages fixed, suicide would go up! Or, we may actually cut back suicide by eliminating the federal minimal wage totally thus creating an enormous hole between state minimal wages and the federal one. These appear non-sensical.”
However Kaufman, the lead creator on the paper, says this studying was primarily based on a misunderstanding, and that the measure was simply meant as a uniform approach to signify the minimal wage in several states. “Their argument actually doesn’t make sense. I might moderately be responding to criticism from any person who understood the strategies we used,” Kaufman instructed me in a cellphone name.
One other coauthor, Melvin Livingston, instructed me, “We selected to specific the minimal wage because the distinction between the federal and state minimal wage for ease of interpretation. As a result of means the mannequin is constructed, equivalent outcomes can be discovered if we used the efficient state minimal wage. It’s incorrect to interpret the outcomes as suggesting that decreasing the federal minimal wage would end in fewer suicides. On the contrary, the outcomes point out that as minimal wages improve, suicide charges lower.”
One other concern, raised by UC-San Diego economist and veteran minimal wage researcher Jeffrey Clemens, is that the paper finds a statistically insignificant impact of minimal wage hikes on faculty graduates within the different path — the suicide price goes up amongst them in states that increase their minimal wage. That’s puzzling, even when insignificant, and it’s not clear why there must be any correlation in any respect with faculty grads.
The vital factor right here, although, isn’t the main points of this one examine. It’s the purpose these 4 research, approaching the query of minimal wage and mortality from totally different angles, make collectively. Thus far the talk over the minimal wage, not less than in economics, has centered monomaniacally on the consequences on jobs: Does a better minimal price jobs for low-income individuals and so do extra hurt than good?
We’ve made plenty of progress on that query, and it appears clear that modest will increase do extra good than hurt for the employees affected: the wage increases swamp whatever job losses might occur. However this new analysis means that the deal with job results has prevented us from one other vital impact of minimal wage legal guidelines: the impact on public well being.
We’d like way more analysis on these matters. However these current research all counsel to me that there’s an actual risk minimal wage legal guidelines, and EITC will increase, save lives. If that discovering holds up in these and different contexts, that’s a strong new argument for minimal wage will increase.
Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Twice every week, you’ll get a roundup of concepts and options for tackling our largest challenges: bettering public well being, lowering human and animal struggling, easing catastrophic dangers, and — to place it merely — getting higher at doing good.
Future Excellent is funded partly by particular person contributions, grants, and sponsorships. Be taught extra here.