Good morning and welcome to On Politics, a day by day political evaluation of the 2020 elections based mostly on reporting by New York Instances jo
Good morning and welcome to On Politics, a day by day political evaluation of the 2020 elections based mostly on reporting by New York Instances journalists.
Enroll right here to get On Politics in your inbox each weekday.
The place issues stand
-
It seems Wisconsinites will likely be going to the polls in the course of a pandemic in any case. A final-ditch try by the state’s Democratic governor to postpone at the moment’s major got here to a screeching halt on Monday, when the State Supreme Courtroom dominated in favor of the Republican-held State Legislature, which opposed the transfer. Whereas Wisconsin’s presidential primaries usually are not anticipated to be significantly shut, many different races on the poll at the moment — together with a seat on the State Supreme Courtroom that’s at present held by a conservative supported by President Trump — are closely contested.
-
In its first ruling on a coronavirus-related case, the federal Supreme Courtroom additionally voted on Monday to forestall Wisconsin from extending its deadline for absentee voting. The courtroom break up alongside ideological strains, with the 5 conservative justices voting towards their 4 liberal colleagues. Writing in dissent, Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued, “The courtroom’s order, I worry, will lead to large disenfranchisement.” And voting-rights advocates are echoing these fears. They warned that many extra virus-related voting circumstances have been prone to come after Monday’s rulings. In Wisconsin, an all-important swing state in November’s basic election, Republicans have fought arduous to impose better restrictions on voting, together with a current pre-pandemic effort to purge from the voter rolls roughly 200,000 individuals who have been believed to have moved.
-
As soon as a gimmicky thought left Kellyanne Conway’s lips final week, it appeared inevitable that it could come true: The at all times outspoken White Home adviser prompt that as a substitute of criticizing Trump over his virus response, Joe Biden ought to name and provide to assist. Apparently neither the president nor Biden wished to be the one caught saying it shouldn’t occur, in order that they shared a short, perfunctory name on Monday. And that was that. “It was brief, it was 15 minutes,” Trump advised reporters, saying solely that the tone was “pleasant” and that Biden had supplied “solutions.” After all, we don’t know what they have been, as a result of Trump and Biden agreed to not speak publicly about that half. Apparently the 2 rivals are completely keen to have a constructive dialog about coverage — so long as it’s not public, and completely nonbinding.
A person left the Frank P. Zeidler Municipal Constructing in Milwaukee on Monday after he wasn’t capable of solid his poll on the already closed drop-off website.
Trump seems to typically dislike inspectors basic.
A nationwide survey of hospitals revealed widespread frustration over difficulties in buying coronavirus exams, in line with a report released Monday by the Department of Health and Human Services’ inspector general.
But at his news conference on Monday, Trump didn’t want to hear about it.
Sparring with multiple reporters who asked him about the report’s findings — which were based on a survey of 323 randomly selected hospitals — he spent as much time insinuating that the inspector general was untrustworthy as he did speaking to the hospitals’ concerns.
Separately, Trump on Friday fired the intelligence community inspector general who had forwarded the whistle-blower report that led to the president’s impeachment. On Sunday, that inspector, Michael Atkinson, pointedly spoke out in support of whistle-blowers. “Please do not allow recent events to silence your voices,” he said in a statement.
At the briefing Monday, Trump seemed to grow irritated at the mention of the words “inspector general.”
He cut off multiple reporters, asking first for the name of the inspector general who had led the survey of hospitals (it’s Christi Grimm, he was told) and then challenging them to find out when she had been appointed to her position. (He was told that it was this year, and that she had been with the department since 1999.)
As he has consistently done in the past, Trump responded to questions about the availability of coronavirus tests by rejecting the premise. He bragged that the United States had conducted more tests than any other country. And he refused to accept that the buck stopped with him. “States can do their own testing,” he said. “We’re the federal government. We’re not supposed to stand on street corners doing testing.”
With Boris Johnson, the British prime minister and a Trump ally, now in intensive care, the president did say that he was open to having more officials in his administration tested to make sure the virus wasn’t going around the White House. “I think we’ll probably have quite a few tests,” he said. “It’s not the worst idea.”
On Politics is also available as a newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox.
Is there anything you think we’re missing? Anything you want to see more of? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at [email protected].