Pentagon Publicizes New Steps to Weed out Extremism in Troops

HomeUS Politics

Pentagon Publicizes New Steps to Weed out Extremism in Troops

WASHINGTON — One younger soldier mentioned that for the primary 4 months after he joined his Military unit, a flag representing the right-wing mili


WASHINGTON — One younger soldier mentioned that for the primary 4 months after he joined his Military unit, a flag representing the right-wing militia the Three Percenters hung within the entry corridor of his barracks.

A Black Marine described feeling sick when he noticed the enduring red-and-gold flag of his army service being waved by rioters throughout the Jan. 6 Capitol assault.

A white brigadier basic fretted privately about whether or not service members may get in bother for supporting former President Donald J. Trump. A Black Military sergeant described having nobody to speak to in his workplace within the aftermath of the demise of George Floyd in police custody.

The Pentagon final week concluded its 60-day “stand down” to deal with extremism within the army. With a handful of exceptions, each unit within the armed forces has now had some type of dialogue about why white supremacy and extremism — laid naked by the variety of veterans who took half within the Jan. 6 Capitol riot — has no place within the American army.

However because the Pentagon on Friday introduced its path ahead — a working group might be set as much as look at methods to higher vet recruits and methods to higher educate service members who could also be focused by extremist organizations — senior Protection Division officers acknowledged that one factor is obvious: Rooting out extremist views from a army of 1.three million active-duty troops drawn from Alaska to Florida might be an uphill slog.

“The overwhelming majority of those that serve in uniform and their civilian colleagues achieve this with nice honor and integrity, however any extremist conduct within the drive can have an outsized influence,” Protection Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III mentioned in a memo on Friday.

The Pentagon is directing the entire army providers to ask recruits a standardized set of questions on extremism in its screening questionnaires to assist weed out those that may participate in extremist organizations. However that, by itself, might be troublesome to implement — as a result of the Pentagon doesn’t particularly bar membership in a lot of these teams.

Mr. Austin’s memo says that the up to date screening questionnaires will nonetheless higher allow officers to “make clear that any demonstrably false solutions supplied in response may type the premise for punitive motion for fraudulent enlistment.” A Protection Division official mentioned the Pentagon was nonetheless attempting to determine methods to keep away from working afoul of the First Modification protections of freedom of speech and freedom of meeting.

The phrase “stand down” is used within the army to confer with any problem that the protection secretary decides is necessary sufficient that it must be addressed by means of discussions throughout the drive. Prior to now, “stand downs” has been employed to deal with matters as various as security considerations, sexual assault and suicide.

The most recent “stand down” was ordered up by the primary Black protection secretary, to remind the nation’s army personnel that the oath they took to assist and defend the Structure implies that they can not storm the Capitol to cease lawmakers from certifying election outcomes they don’t like.

The “stand down” periods, mentioned John F. Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary, demonstrated that “the drive needs higher steering about what extremist exercise actually is,” calling it “a starvation for extra info and context.”

Mr. Kirby mentioned the division would additionally work on methods to higher put together service members leaving the army to re-enter civilian life.

“In some circumstances, once you retire, they let you know how to select a swimsuit and a tie,” Mr. Kirby mentioned throughout a information convention. “However there’s nothing in there, not persistently anyway, about this explicit drawback.” He mentioned that extremist teams had been “looking for the sorts of abilities, the sorts of management that our women and men exude.”

Protection Division officers and enlisted service members interviewed for this text mentioned that the periods led to some painful conversations. However the course of was typically characterised by a scripted, pressured supply from some commanders and senior leaders who appeared uncomfortable with their job.

The Marine Corps launched a video final month that includes prime leaders that some Black Marines, in personal chats, characterised as seeming pressured. Within the video, Gen. David H. Berger, the Marine commandant, and Sgt. Maj. Troy E. Black, the senior enlisted chief, each of them white males, urged Marines to concentrate to the “stand down.” Their awkward presentation prompted Job and Function, a web based information website centered on the army and veterans, to put in writing an article about it with the headline, “Prime Marine Leaders Look Like They’ve Been Taken Hostage in This New Video.”

In different messages to the drive, some senior leaders struggled to steadiness normal rally-the-troops speak with the realities laid naked by the Capitol riots’ publicity of extremism within the army.

Gen. James C. McConville, the Military chief of workers, sought to bridge that divide. “Nicely, the message from the senior leaders is we now have the world’s biggest Military,” he mentioned throughout the service’s “stand down” session with senior leaders. “The way in which we preserve that’s stopping behaviors that damage our troopers and break belief with the American folks. Behaviors like extremism, racism, sexual harassment and sexual assault — they damage our troopers and so they break belief with the American folks so we can not have them in our Military.”

In actual fact, as Pentagon leaders are fast to say, the army can’t be a mirrored image of America with out internet hosting the identical varieties of individuals and allegiances which are embedded within the inhabitants as a complete. However whereas the army is one in every of America’s most various establishments — some 43 p.c of these on energetic responsibility are folks of shade — Protection Division officers acknowledge that the views of its white service members skew conservative.

On American bases around the globe, televisions are sometimes tuned to Fox Information. This was notably so throughout the Trump administration; since President Biden was inaugurated, CNN and MSNBC have began exhibiting up extra.

Officers with the Biden administration have expressed considerations about sure broadcasts concentrating on troops. On March 2, Mr. Kirby ordered up a evaluate of programming on the American Forces Community, which caters to service members and households overseas.

Whereas the army can restrict what sorts of packages are broadcast in public areas on bases, the Pentagon may run into First Modification points because it tries to vet recruits and even active-duty troops.

On Jan. 29, Consultant Jackie Speier, Democrat of California, despatched a letter to Mr. Biden, Mr. Austin and Avril Haines, the director of nationwide intelligence, asking them to replace the background investigation course of for army service members. She mentioned that it ought to incorporate a evaluate of their social media profiles to establish white-supremacist or violent-extremist ties, in addition to set up procedures to evaluate the social media exercise of recruits earlier than they be part of the armed forces.

Specialists notice that asking somebody if they’re an extremist is hardly the answer. Deborah Carrington, a former federal investigator with the Protection Safety Service and the Workplace of Personnel Administration, mentioned asking folks “questions on being a part of a terrorist group or being concerned in terrorist actions,” was hardly ever productive.

“They received’t admit to it,” she mentioned. “The one option to discover out is to interview somebody who was concerned in these actions with him.”



www.nytimes.com