Reality-Checking the January Democratic Debate

HomeUS Politics

Reality-Checking the January Democratic Debate

Six of the candidates vying for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination took the stage Tuesday night time in Des Moines for his or her final de


Six of the candidates vying for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination took the stage Tuesday night time in Des Moines for his or her final debate earlier than the Iowa caucuses kick off the first season in lower than three weeks.

Right here is how the candidates’ remarks stacked up towards the reality.

WHAT THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT

What Mr. Biden Stated:

“I mentioned 13 years in the past it was a mistake to offer the president the authority to go to battle”

Mr. Biden was certainly one of 77 senators who voted to authorize the battle in Iraq in October 2002 — and he referred to as that vote a mistake in 2005. The New York Instances reviewed how he made that call almost twenty years in the past and located that the episode reveals how he operates “as a Senate dealmaker at coronary heart.”

On different army engagements, potential and precise, Mr. Biden has exercised extra warning. Throughout his bid for the presidency in 2008, for instance, Mr. Biden warned that battle with Iran “isn’t just a nasty possibility. It could be a catastrophe.”

When he grew to become vice chairman, Mr. Biden was a lonely voice within the White Home who argued towards rising troop ranges in Afghanistan in 2009 — a struggle he finally misplaced. He then repeatedly pushed to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by 2014 and, although President Barack Obama shared that goal, america nonetheless had troops in Afghanistan when the 2 males left workplace.

What the information are

What Mr. Sanders mentioned:

“Each main environmental group has mentioned ‘no’ to this new commerce settlement as a result of it doesn’t even have the phrase ‘local weather change’ in it.”

That is true. Democrats fought for language calling for a dedication to the Paris Settlement on local weather change, in addition to binding local weather change requirements, however these provisions did not make it into the final measure that handed the Home. That invoice, which awaits a vote within the Senate, doesn’t embody any point out of local weather change.

WHAT THE FACTS ARE

WHAT MR. SANDERS SAID:

“And the tip results of these two, simply P.T.N.R. with China, Joe, and Nafta, value us some 4 million jobs, as a part of the race to the underside.”

That is principally true. As we reported when this issue came up last September, whereas NAFTA usually receives a lot of the blame from Democrats for the lack of American manufacturing jobs, it’s P.N.T.R. — Everlasting Regular Commerce Relations with China — that economists are inclined to level to as the reason for extra job losses.

A 2014 report from the Financial Coverage Institute estimated that 851,000 jobs have been misplaced due to the commerce deficit with Canada and Mexico. The identical group discovered that the commerce deficit in items with China value 3.four million jobs from 2001 to 2017.

Nonetheless, most economists say that it’s troublesome to pinpoint blame on particular commerce relationships for jobs losses, as commerce creates winners and losers throughout the work drive and usually boosts financial development.

Reality checks and explainers by Linda Qiu, Lisa Friedman and Alan Rappeport.



www.nytimes.com