With a Push From Trump, Senate Strikes to Set up Conservative at U.S. Media Company

HomeUS Politics

With a Push From Trump, Senate Strikes to Set up Conservative at U.S. Media Company

WASHINGTON — Senate Republican leaders, below strain from President Trump to put in an ally who would dictate extra favorable information protectio


WASHINGTON — Senate Republican leaders, below strain from President Trump to put in an ally who would dictate extra favorable information protection of his administration, are shifting to swiftly verify a conservative filmmaker to guide the impartial company in control of state-funded media shops.

Senator Jim Risch of Idaho, the chairman of the Overseas Relations Committee, has scheduled a committee assembly subsequent week to advance the long-stalled nomination of Michael Pack, an in depth ally of Stephen K. Bannon’s and a favorite of conservative activists, to lead the U.S. Agency for Global Media.

The action came after Mr. Trump pressed Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, during a recent call to speed up Mr. Pack’s nomination, according to three people familiar with the private conversation who discussed it on the condition of anonymity.

At a news conference last month, the president said the Senate’s failure to confirm Mr. Pack was “preventing us from managing the Voice of America.”

“The Senate will be acting on key nominations that relate directly to the safety of the American people, oversight of our coronavirus legislation, and more,” Mr. McConnell said.

A spokesman for Mr. McConnell said that the majority leader and Mr. Trump “talk all the time” but that the office does not read out their conversations. A spokesman for the White House declined to comment on the call regarding Mr. Pack.

Democrats who have long opposed Mr. Pack’s nomination argued that it was inappropriate to convene to consider business unrelated to the novel coronavirus, particularly someone they called “a controversial political nominee.”

“It’s now totally controlled by the deep-state apparatus,” he said.

Mr. Pack previously served as the director of Worldnet — now the television component of V.O.A. — under President George Bush, and worked at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting as a senior executive in its television production division.

“In today’s connected age, molding global public sentiment matters,” Mr. Pack said at his confirmation hearing. “As Lincoln would have counseled, we need to counter lies with the truth. We need to make clear to the world the ideals America strives to live up to.”

Even before the White House began publicly attacking V.O.A., its current top managers, Obama appointees and drawn largely from traditional media backgrounds, expected to lose their jobs if Mr. Pack were confirmed.

Mr. Pack was nominated by Mr. Trump in June 2018 to lead the agency, prompting protests from Democrats and quiet resistance from some Republicans on Capitol Hill, including former Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, then the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, who showed little interest in moving the nomination.

“To date, his responses have been perfunctory and inadequate,” Mr. Menendez wrote.

But the larger concern is that, if confirmed, Mr. Pack would try to influence coverage at V.O.A. and other networks. With a budget of $750 million and a reach of more than 345 million people globally, the U.S. Agency for Global Media tries to promote American democratic values by melding journalism and political messaging across an array of radio and television channels. Its 3,300 employees are legally protected from political interference.

After Mr. Trump’s comments at his April news conference, Amanda Bennett, who leads Voice of America, released a lengthy statement defending its reporting.

“One of the big differences between publicly funded independent media, like the Voice of America, and state-controlled media is that we are free to show all sides of an issue and are actually mandated to do so by law,” Ms. Bennett said.

Elizabeth Williamson contributed reporting.



www.nytimes.com