LIVESTOCK-Technical buying, solid U.S. beef demand boost CME cattle

HomeStock

LIVESTOCK-Technical buying, solid U.S. beef demand boost CME cattle


By Tom Polansek

CHICAGO, Oct 6 (Reuters)Technical buying and solid demand for U.S. beef lifted Chicago Mercantile Exchange live and feeder cattle futures on Wednesday, traders said.

The cattle markets continue to rebound from recent losses that were technically overdone, analysts said.

Front-month CME October live cattle futures LCV1 reached its highest price since Sept. 16 at 124.000 cents per pound and ended up 1 cent at 123.825 cents per pound. The most-active December contract LCZ1 settled 0.375 cent higher at 128.225 cents.

Most-active November feeder cattle FCX1 touched its highest price since Sept. 24 and ended 1.250 cents firmer at 158.125 cents per pound.

Recent gains in live and feeder cattle are giving traders some confidence that the markets may have set near-term bottoms in prices, analysts said. Prices had dropped too low at a time when domestic and export demand for U.S. beef is firm, they said.

U.S. beef exports in August topped $1 billion in value for the first time amid record sales to China, according to new data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Total exports rose about 21% by volume from last year in August.

“Obviously breaking the $1 billion mark in a single month is a huge milestone for U.S. beef, and that’s not possible unless a wide range of markets are hitting on all cylinders,” said Dan Halstrom, chief executive for the trade group U.S. Meat Export Federation.

Total U.S. pork exports in August were up 3.6% by volume from last year, the USDA said.

CME hog futures, meanwhile, were weaker as the market continued to pull back from a two-month high reached last week, traders said.

October lean hogs LHV1 settled 1.350 cents lower at 89.625 cents per pound. Most-active December lean hogs LHZ1 slipped 0.825 cent to close at 81.725 cents. Both contracts touched their lowest prices since Sept. 27.

(Reporting by Tom Polansek in Chicago; Editing by Shailesh Kuber)

(([email protected]; https://twitter.com/tpolansek))

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.





www.nasdaq.com